IStructE · Resources
Glossary
The terms, grades and abbreviations used in the IStructE process, defined plainly.
Who this is for:Candidates at any stage ·Mentors ·Supporters ·Employers
IStructE and ICE use different words for related things. These are IStructE's.
Grades and post-nominals
- MIStructE
- Chartered Member of the Institution of Structural Engineers. Requires the Professional Review Interview and the Chartered Membership Examination.
- IMIStructE
- Incorporated Member. A full grade in its own right, with its own interview and its own examination — not a lesser version of Chartered Membership.
- AIStructE
- Associate. Candidates satisfying the Associate academic requirement are elected AIStructE CEng on passing the Chartered Member interview, and the examination rules do not apply.
- FIStructE
- Fellow. Relevant to candidates because a supporter must be a Fellow or a Member.
- CEng · IEng
- Chartered Engineer and Incorporated Engineer — Engineering Council registrations, distinct from Institution membership though usually sought alongside it.
The process
- Professional Review
- The whole two-stage process: the interview and the examination. Both must be satisfied before election.
- PRI
- Professional Review Interview. Two trained reviewers, normally remote, 60 to 90 minutes, covering all ten Core Objectives.
- IPD
- Initial Professional Development — the progressive development of specialist knowledge and skills, described in terms of the Core Objectives.
- Core Objective
- One of ten areas of competence, each set to a minimum standard of Knowledge, Experience or Ability. All ten are assessed at the interview.
- Applications and Professional Review Panel
- The Institution panel that reviews and approves reviewers' decisions before a result is released.
- Reviewer
- One of the two trained, experienced members who conduct the interview and determine whether each objective has been met.
The three minimum standards
- Knowledge (K)
- Understanding of the subject and its principles. The standard for professional standards, and for commercial and legal matters.
- Experience (E)
- Having performed the subject, independently or under supervision.
- Ability (B)
- Performing the subject without supervision, and being competent to advise others. The highest of the three, and the one candidates most often under-claim.
Submissions
- IPD final report forms
- One per Core Objective, completed once the IPD requirements are satisfied and — on the individually managed route — signed by your mentor.
- Experience report
- A two-page account of your roles and responsibilities across your career, submitted with the forms as a single document.
- Portfolio of work
- A single PDF, sub-divided by Core Objective, sent directly to your two reviewers before the interview. Maximum 300 pages.
- Portfolio checklist
- The Institution's form, signed and placed as the first page of the portfolio. Never reproduced on this site — download the current version.
- Quarterly report forms
- Records of progress against each objective on the individually managed route. Supporting documents, outside the portfolio page count.
- Progress summary record
- A summary of development on the individually managed route, submitted to reviewers alongside the portfolio.
- Supporting documents
- Quarterly reports, progress summary records or signed training records, depending on route. They go directly to the reviewers and do not count towards the 300 pages.
The examination
- Section 1a
- Schemes. Two distinct, viable and sustainable solutions on the Chartered and supplementary papers; one on the Incorporated paper.
- Section 1b
- The professional communication — amendments to the brief that reduce material usage, as a letter or an email. Not present on the supplementary paper.
- Section 2c
- Design calculations establishing the form, size and approximate A1–A3 carbon of the principal structural elements.
- Section 2d
- Drawings and critical details for estimating purposes. A minimum of three critical details is ordinarily expected.
- Section 2e
- The construction method statement, tailored to your own scheme. Not present on the supplementary paper.
- Principal structural element
- A member the candidate identifies as structurally decisive. As a guide, expect to design five to seven.
- A1–A3
- The product stage of an embodied carbon assessment — the stage the examination asks for. Calculated as mass × embodied carbon factor.
- Embodied carbon factor (ECF)
- The carbon per kilogram of a material, in kgCO₂e/kg. Industry-average values are recommended; state your source.
- Open book
- Reference books and a folder of notes may be brought into the examination. No computer, no internet, and no access to any of it during the lunch break.
Rules that catch people
- Three-year interview rule
- Postponing the examination for three consecutive years after the interview means a full PRI must be applied for again on eventually passing.
- Five-year examination rule
- The examination must be passed within five years of the interview, with no gap longer than three years between attempts.
- Partial re-interview
- Where three or fewer objectives are failed, the re-interview covers only those objectives. Four or more means a full re-interview.
- Supporter
- A Fellow or Member who confirms you are a fit and proper person to become a Member — not that you are competent. That is the reviewers' judgement.
- Mentor
- On the individually managed route, the person who reviews your progress against the objectives and signs your IPD final report forms. They attest to your development, not to the outcome.
- Automatic fail
- An unsafe structure, or a scheme where stability is ignored, fails the examination regardless of how the rest of the paper is answered.
Related pages and tools
- Compared with ICEA factual comparison for engineers deciding between them, or pursuing both.
- Official sourcesEvery document this domain draws on, what was read and how, and everything that only IStructE can tell you.
- Core ObjectivesWhat IStructE assesses, what Knowledge, Experience and Ability actually mean, and where the two grades differ.
- How it worksThe Professional Review has two parts, and they assess different things. This is how the whole process fits together.