Skip to content
Queensferry

Phase 3 · Complete your IPD

The three routes for demonstrating IPD

Individually managed, comparable accredited training records, or retrospectively collated — how to choose.

Who this is for:Candidates at any stage ·Mentors ·Employers

There are three routes for demonstrating that you have achieved your IPD. They suit different situations, and the Institution is explicit that none of them gives you a better chance at the interview.

What the guidance says about choosing

Institution of Structural Engineers

  • There are three routes for demonstrating achievement of IPD: individually managed, accredited training schemes, and retrospectively collated.
  • You should pick the route most suitable for you.
  • There is no clear difference in pass rates in the Professional Review Interview based on the route used.

From IPD Guidance — Chartered Member, Institution of Structural Engineers.

The three routes side by side

From the current IPD guidance. Supporting documents go directly to your reviewers, not to the Institution, and do not count towards the portfolio page limit.
 Individually managedAccredited training recordsRetrospectively collated
Who it suitsYou have a mentor and are building evidence as you goYou are on a comparable scheme accredited by another bodyNeither a mentor nor a scheme has been available to you
MentorA personal mentor, meeting you regularlyAs your scheme requiresA Chartered Member may assist, but need not sign anything
Records keptIPD quarterly report forms and a progress summary recordYour scheme's full training records, signedAssembled from previous experience up to the point of application
IPD final report formsRequired, signed by your personal mentorRequiredRequired
Sent to reviewersPortfolio, plus quarterly reports and progress summaryPortfolio, plus signed training recordsPortfolio
Pass rate at the PRINo clear differenceNo clear differenceNo clear difference

From the current IPD guidance. Supporting documents go directly to your reviewers, not to the Institution, and do not count towards the portfolio page limit.

How to choose

Work backwards from your situation rather than from which route sounds most rigorous.

Do you have someone who can mentor you properly? Not someone who will sign a form, but an experienced structural engineer who will meet you regularly, review your progress against the Core Objectives and tell you when your evidence is thin. If yes, the individually managed route is the most useful, because the records it requires are also the records that make writing the final report forms possible.

Are you on a comparable scheme accredited by another body? The Institution does not accredit company training schemes, but it will accept records from schemes accredited elsewhere — ICE and HKIE are the examples the guidance names. The experience must be in structural engineering.

Neither? The retrospectively collated route exists for exactly that, and it is not a lesser option. You assemble the documents from experience you already have. A Chartered Member can help you do it without needing to sign anything.

The practical difference

It is in when the work happens, not how much of it there is.

Individually managed spreads the record-keeping across years, in small pieces, while the detail is fresh. Retrospectively collated compresses it into the months before you apply, from memory and old files. The total effort is similar; the second is harder, and the evidence tends to be thinner because the specifics have faded.

If you are early in your career and have any choice at all, that is the argument for starting records now.

Choosing your route

6 items · saved in this browser only

Related pages and tools

Read the official guidance