Skip to content
Queensferry

Phase 6 · Prepare for the review

The Professional Review

The three parts of the review, how they fit together, and what the reviewers are doing.

Who this is for:Candidates at any stage

The review is a presentation, an interview and a written Communication Task. Two peer reviewers must both be satisfied, on the day, that you have met every attribute at the required level.

The shape of the Professional ReviewThe review begins with a 15-minute presentation, followed by an interview. Presentation and interview together last up to 60 minutes at Incorporated level and 75 at Chartered level. The Communication Task follows at a time given in your notification letter: 60 minutes at Incorporated level, 90 at Chartered, with 15 minutes to upload.PRESENTATION + INTERVIEW: 60 MIN AT IENG · 75 MIN AT CENGPresentation15 minutesAn aspect of your report, expanded — not asummary of itInterviewThe balance of the timeTwo reviewers confirm your competencein all seven areasCommunication Task60 min IEng · 90 min CEngInvigilated and closed book, then 15 minutes to uploadAbout four weeks before: your notification letter gives the date, your reviewers' names and the timing of the Communication Task. Check for a conflict ofinterest and tell ICE immediately if there is one. Never contact a reviewer directly.Your reviewers pre-assess the report. If they agree it is not of a satisfactory standard, the review is deferred until you have addressed their comments.Afterwards: a result by email within six weeks. Both reviewers must be satisfied on the day, in every attribute area.

How the review is run

Institution of Civil Engineers

  • It comprises a presentation to your reviewers, an interview with them, and a written Communication Task invigilated by ICE staff.
  • It is held online via MS Teams unless you have been allocated an in-person review. ICE runs both: online offers flexibility and carbon savings, and in-person reviews are part of reviewer training and development and are vital to the integrity of the programme.
  • You indicate a preference when applying, but ICE may allocate you to the other format depending on the reviewers you are matched with.
  • To be successful, both reviewers must be satisfied on the day that you have met all attributes at the required level.
  • There may be an observer; you will be told on the day. They take no part in your review.
  • A third reviewer may attend where the subject matter of your application needs specialist knowledge.
  • All mobile devices must be switched off before the interview starts, and recording the interview is prohibited.
  • Your reviewers should not be connected to you or your employer. If you know one, or think there may be a conflict of interest, tell ICE immediately.
Reviewers
2peer reviewers who must both agreeA third reviewer may attend where specialist knowledge is needed, and an observer may be present but takes no part.
Presentation length
15minutesRun over and your reviewers may stop you so the interview can proceed.
Presentation and interview together — IEng level
60minutes maximum
Presentation and interview together — CEng level
75minutes maximum
Communication Task — IEng level
60minutesTwo questions set, one answered. The response is a straightforward document such as a technical memo or note.
Communication Task — CEng level
90minutesTwo questions set, each a scenario paired with a response format. One is answered.
Notice of your review date
4weeks, approximatelyThe notification letter names your reviewers and gives the timing of your Communication Task. Never contact reviewers directly.

From Incorporated and Chartered Professional Review Guidance, Institution of Civil Engineers.

What reviewers are actually doing

They are not trying to catch you out, and they are not testing whether you know everything. They have read your report before the day — they pre-assess it — and they arrive with a fairly clear idea of which attributes are well evidenced and which are not.

The interview is where they fill the gaps. ICE says it directly: if you have not demonstrated sufficient evidence of meeting a particular attribute in your report, your reviewers will pose specific questions to try to draw out your knowledge and experience in that area.

Two things follow from this. First, the thin part of your report is where the questioning will concentrate — so it is worth knowing which part that is. Second, the questions are an opportunity rather than an attack: a reviewer probing your commercial evidence is trying to find something they can accept.

The pre-assessment

Your reviewers assess your report before the review. If they agree it is not of a satisfactory standard, your review is deferred, the Professional Reviews team tells you why and what to do next, and the review is rearranged once you have addressed the comments.

This is worth knowing for two reasons. It is a real quality gate — a weak report does not simply get a hard interview. And it is another reason to give your lead sponsor enough time to criticise the draft properly.

The shape of the day

  1. Before

    Notification letter, about four weeks ahead

    Date, time, reviewer names, and the timing of your Communication Task. Check for conflicts of interest immediately.

  2. First 15 minutes

    Your presentation

    An aspect of your report, expanded. Reviewers may stop you if you run over so the interview can proceed.

  3. The balance of the time

    The interview

    Presentation and interview together last a maximum of 60 minutes at IPR/IIPR and 75 minutes at CPR/CIPR.

  4. After the interview

    The Communication Task

    At the time given in your notification letter, invigilated by ICE staff. 60 minutes at IEng level, 90 at CEng, then 15 minutes to upload.

  5. Within six weeks

    Your result, by email

    Both reviewers must have been satisfied in every attribute area.

Related pages and tools

Read the official guidance