Module 4 · Lesson 4.3
Trusses as beams, tension coefficients and space frames
Reading a truss as a deep beam, a faster hand method, and stepping into three dimensions.
Why this matters
Joints and sections will solve any plane truss, eventually. But a truss is really a beam with the material moved to where it is useful, and seeing it that way lets you estimate chord forces in your head. Tension coefficients then make the arithmetic mechanical — and, unlike the method of joints, extend to three dimensions without any new ideas.
By the end of this lesson you should be able to
- Estimate chord and diagonal forces by treating the truss as a beam
- Use tension coefficients to solve a joint
- Recognise a compound truss and know why joints alone can stall on one
- Apply the determinacy count m + r = 3j to a pin-jointed space frame
What you should already know
- Method of joints and method of sections (this module)
- Determinacy of plane trusses (this module)
- Shear force and bending moment (Module 3)
Cut a parallel-chord truss with a vertical section and take the left-hand part as a free body. Whatever the internal arrangement, that free body must supply the same shear force and bending moment as a solid beam of the same span under the same load.
The truss supplies them by division of labour:
- The chords are horizontal, so they cannot help with vertical shear. They resist the bending moment, acting as a push–pull couple: one chord in compression, the other in tension, separated by the depth d. So chord force = M/d.
- The diagonals and verticals are the only members with a vertical component, so they carry the shear force in their entirety. For a diagonal at angle θ to the horizontal, the vertical component must equal the shear: F sin θ = V.
That is the whole of §4.5 in two sentences, and it turns a truss into something you can size on the back of an envelope.
What it calculates: chord and diagonal forces from the equivalent beam's M and V
- M
- bending moment of the equivalent beam at the section (kNm)
- V
- shear force of the equivalent beam at the section (kN)
- d
- depth between the chord centrelines (m)
- θ
- angle of the diagonal to the horizontal (degrees)
This assumes
- Parallel chords, so the chord forces form a couple of constant lever arm
- Pin joints and loads applied only at the joints
- One diagonal or vertical crossing the section
In plain terms: Chord force is inversely proportional to depth: double the depth of a truss and you halve the chord forces. That single relationship explains why long-span trusses are deep, and why a shallow truss is expensive.
Predict first
A parallel-chord truss is redesigned twice as deep, with the same span and loading. What happens to the chord forces?
The method of tension coefficients is a bookkeeping change that makes joint equilibrium almost mechanical. For a member from joint A to joint B carrying tension T over a length L, define
t = T/L
The force's components are then simply t·Δx and t·Δy, where Δx and Δy are the coordinate differences. Joint equilibrium becomes:
Σ t·Δx + X = 0 and Σ t·Δy + Y = 0
No trigonometry appears anywhere. You never compute an angle, never take a sine or a cosine — just coordinate differences, which you read straight off the geometry. Recover the forces at the end with T = tL.
The real prize is that this extends to three dimensions with a third equation, Σ t·Δz + Z = 0, and nothing else changes. Angles in three dimensions are miserable to handle directly; coordinate differences are not.
Space frames are pin-jointed structures in three dimensions. Every joint now has three equations of equilibrium instead of two, so the determinacy condition becomes:
m + r = 3j
with m + r − 3j > 0 indicating indeterminacy and < 0 a mechanism — exactly the same logic as the plane case, and with the same caveat: the count is necessary but not sufficient. A badly arranged space frame can satisfy it and still be unstable.
The simplest useful case is a tripod: three legs from a common apex down to three anchors. It has m = 3, j = 4 and r = 9 (three pinned supports), so m + r − 3j = 3 + 9 − 12 = 0. Determinate, and if the arrangement is symmetric the three legs share the vertical load equally.
Worked example
A truss read as a beam, and a symmetric tripod
Given
- Parallel-chord truss: span 24.0 m, depth 3.00 m, simply supported
- Uniform load equivalent to 40.0 kN/m along the span
- Separately: a tripod with apex 3.00 m above three anchors on a circle of radius 2.00 m, carrying 60.0 kN vertically
Find
The bottom chord force at mid-span, and the force in each tripod leg.
Practice
A parallel-chord truss spans 24.0 m with a depth of 3.00 m and carries the equivalent of 40.0 kN/m. What is the force in the bottom chord at mid-span, in kN?
Practice
A member runs from (0, 0) to (4.00 m, 3.00 m) and carries a tensile force of 50.0 kN. What is its tension coefficient, in kN per metre?
Practice
A pin-jointed space frame has 12 members, 6 joints and 6 restraint components. What is m + r − 3j?
Worked example
A compound truss that stops the method of joints
Given
- Two simple triangular trusses, each spanning 6.00 m, joined side by side
- They are connected by three members that are neither concurrent nor parallel
- Total: 21 members, 12 joints, 3 reaction components
Find
Whether the truss is determinate, why the method of joints stalls, and how to restart it.
Practice
A compound plane truss has 21 members, 12 joints and 3 reaction components. What is m + r − 2j?
Summary
- A parallel-chord truss is a beam: chords carry the moment as a couple, diagonals carry the shear
- Chord force = M/d, so doubling the depth halves the chord forces
- Diagonal force = V/sin θ
- Tension coefficient t = T/L turns joint equilibrium into Σt·Δx = 0 and Σt·Δy = 0, with no trigonometry
- The same method extends to three dimensions by adding Σt·Δz = 0
- Space frames: m + r = 3j for static determinacy
- A compound truss may need a section before the method of joints can start
This is educational material. It uses simplified examples to teach principles, and must not be relied on for real design or safety-critical decisions. Module overview and checkpoint